Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Court Upholds Exemption for House Purchase: Residence Before Buying Not Disqualifying</h1> The court upheld the Tribunal's decision to grant the assessee exemption under section 54 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It was held that purchasing a ... Capital Gains, Exemption Issues Involved: The judgment addresses the issue of whether an assessee is entitled to claim exemption under section 54 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, when purchasing a portion of a house property previously used for residence.Summary:Facts: The respondent-assessee purchased a house property using a cash gift from her husband, later selling it and buying a 15% share in another property where she continued to reside. The Income-tax Officer rejected her exemption claim, arguing the property was already used for residence before purchase.First Issue - Purchase of Portion of House: The court held that purchasing a portion of a house should enable the assessee to claim exemption under section 54. The judgment cited a previous case where a portion of a house was considered a unit of house property, supporting the assessee's claim for exemption.Second Issue - Residence Prior to Purchase: The court determined that residing in a house before purchase does not disentitle an assessee from claiming exemption under section 54. The absence of any restriction in the Act against purchasing a previously occupied house property supports the assessee's entitlement to exemption.Conclusion: The Tribunal's decision to grant the assessee exemption under section 54 was upheld by the court. The judgment favored the assessee, emphasizing that the purchase of a portion of a house and residing in the property prior to purchase do not negate the right to claim exemption. The reference was answered in favor of the assessee, with no costs awarded.