Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the agreement for production of the Hindi version of a film amounted to a sale exigible to tax under section 2 of the Madras General Sales Tax Act, or only a contract for service.
Analysis: The agreement showed that the producer retained the right to exploit and own the finished cinematographic film, while the assessee was to provide production services, arrange staff and materials, and deliver the censored negatives after completion. The fact that the assessee supplied raw film and undertook the production work did not create a transfer of property in goods or any element of sale. On the terms of the arrangement, the assessee acted only as a facilitator in bringing about the finished product for the producer.
Conclusion: The agreement was a service contract and not a sale; the transaction was not taxable as a sale under section 2 of the Madras General Sales Tax Act.