Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the sale of mustard oil, which fell to the share of a partner on dissolution of a firm and was later sold by him in his own business, was liable to sales tax as a sale by the dealer-manufacturer under the U.P. Sales Tax Act.
Analysis: Section 3 is the charging provision and section 3-A empowers the State Government to notify single-point taxation on specified goods, including mustard oil manufactured for sale. The notification applied to the manufacturer, but the liability had to attach to the dealer-manufacturer. A firm is a dealer under section 2(c), and section 3-C(1) makes it clear that a firm is a taxable unit distinct from its partners. Where the firm manufactured the oil, the firm alone would be the dealer-manufacturer. After dissolution, the oil was allotted to a partner and sold by him in his own new business; he was not the manufacturer in the statutory sense for the notified levy.
Conclusion: The sale was not taxable in the hands of the partner who sold the oil, and the assessment was unsustainable.
Ratio Decidendi: For a notified single-point levy on manufactured goods, tax can be imposed only on the dealer-manufacturer, and a partner who merely receives stock on dissolution and sells it in his individual capacity is not liable as such.