Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appeal before the Appellate Authority was barred by limitation under section 25 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985, and what was the correct starting point for computation of the limitation period.
Analysis: Section 25 permits an appeal within forty-five days from the date on which a copy of the Board's order is issued to the aggrieved person, with a further extension up to sixty days on sufficient cause. Regulation 15 of the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction Regulations, 1987 requires communication of the order under the prescribed signature, showing that issuance of the order is tied to formal communication by the Board. The expression "issued" was treated as synonymous with "served" for the purpose of limitation, so the effective date was the date on which the petitioner actually received the certified copy of the order, not the earlier date on which another party forwarded a copy.
Conclusion: The appeal was not barred by limitation; the starting point was the date on which the certified copy was handed over, and the matter was remitted to the Appellate Authority to consider condonation of delay and proceed in accordance with law.