Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether turnover arising from sales on F.O.R. Khandwa terms and payment against railway receipts could be treated as sales taking place within Madhya Pradesh and thus be assessed to sales tax in the State.
Analysis: The assessment authorities and the Board of Revenue had treated the transactions as inside sales only because the contracts mentioned F.O.R. Khandwa as the place of delivery. The Court held that the expression F.O.R., depending on context, does not by itself establish that delivery took place inside the State; when used with price, it indicates an inclusive price and not necessarily local delivery. The Board had not examined the other contractual terms, including payment against railway receipts, and therefore had not found on the full contract whether the sales were intra-State sales.
Conclusion: It could not be held on the basis of F.O.R. Khandwa and payment against railway receipts alone that the turnover was assessable to sales tax as inside sales in Madhya Pradesh.
Final Conclusion: The references were answered in favour of the assessee, and the matter was sent back for reconsideration of the revision petitions on the basis of all contractual terms.
Ratio Decidendi: F.O.R. notation by itself does not conclusively determine the situs of sale for sales tax purposes, and the character of the transaction must be decided from the whole contract and its terms.