1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter ✕
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal Rules on Stay Petition for Pre-Deposit Waiver in Bio-Medical Waste Case</h1> The tribunal ruled in a case concerning a stay petition against the waiver of pre-deposit of duty, interest, and penalties related to services provided by ... - Issues:- Stay petition against waiver of pre-deposit of duty, interest, and penalties.- Whether services provided fall under 'business auxiliary services'.- Financial hardship plea and limitation on the issue.Analysis:The judgment pertains to a stay petition against the waiver of pre-deposit of duty, interest, and penalties. The case involves a dispute regarding the nature of services provided by the appellant in relation to the collection and disposal of bio-medical wastes. The appellant argues that they are merely a contractor running an incinerator and not providing services, while the respondent contends that the activities constitute 'business auxiliary services'. The key point of contention is whether the services rendered by the appellant fall under the category of 'business auxiliary services' specifically described as 'services on behalf of the client'. The tribunal notes that a detailed appreciation of the facts and agreements is necessary for a final decision. While acknowledging the appellant's financial hardship plea and the issue being barred by limitation, the tribunal rules that the appellant has not sufficiently demonstrated a case for a complete waiver of the amounts involved. Consequently, the tribunal directs the appellant to deposit Rs. 10 lakhs within eight weeks and stay the recovery of the balance amounts pending the appeal's disposal.In conclusion, the judgment highlights the importance of a detailed analysis of the services provided in determining their classification under 'business auxiliary services'. It also emphasizes the need for compliance with deposit requirements despite financial hardship pleas and limitations on the issue. The tribunal's decision strikes a balance by allowing a partial waiver of the pre-deposit amount while awaiting a final resolution on the matter.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
