Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was exigible on the facts found, where the assessees had disclosed the higher interest collections in the returns but claimed that the excess did not constitute income under the Kerala Money Lenders Act.
Analysis: The returns and the material found in search showed that the assessees had disclosed the collection of interest at the higher rate, though they asserted a legal position that the excess was not taxable income. The matter therefore turned on whether there was concealment of income or furnishing of inaccurate particulars in the returns so as to attract the penalty provision. The Tribunal found, on appreciation of the facts, that the alleged excess interest was not hidden from the revenue and that the explanation offered by the assessees was not a case of concealment but a claim as to taxability. In penalty matters, the burden on the assessee is to displace the statutory presumption, and the issue depends on the totality of facts.
Conclusion: The penalty was not exigible and its cancellation was justified.
Final Conclusion: The reference was answered against the Revenue and the penalty deletion was sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the assessee has disclosed the primary facts and only contests the legal taxability of the amount, the case may not involve concealment of income for the purpose of penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.