Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Cenvat credit was admissible on items such as columns, beams, structures, M.S. grating, brackets, staircase and ladder, treated as capital goods or components/accessories of sugar manufacturing machinery.
Analysis: The disputed items were found to be used for supporting, holding and providing access to sugar machinery and thus formed part of the machinery installation rather than mere construction material. Applying the definition of capital goods under Rule 2(b) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002 and the settled view that support structures and allied items used for fabrication or installation of manufacturing equipment can qualify as components and accessories, the credit was held to be allowable. The departmental objection that the items were only structural material was rejected.
Conclusion: Cenvat credit on the impugned items was admissible and the objection of the Revenue failed.