Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) whether depreciation was allowable on assets transferred by the Government without a registered deed of conveyance; (ii) whether the contribution to the insurance fund and the initial contribution thereto were deductible and whether such contribution constituted a contingent liability; (iii) whether the claim for deduction of interest on the loan taken from the State Government required consideration under section 37 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Issue (i): Whether depreciation was allowable on assets transferred by the Government without a registered deed of conveyance.
Analysis: The question was treated as covered by an earlier decision of the Court on the same issue, under which depreciation was held admissible notwithstanding the absence of a registered conveyance deed.
Conclusion: The issue was answered in favour of the assessee.
Issue (ii): Whether the contribution to the insurance fund and the initial contribution thereto were deductible and whether such contribution constituted a contingent liability.
Analysis: The issue was treated as governed by an earlier decision involving the same assessee, where similar deductions had been disallowed and the contribution was not accepted as deductible on the assessee's claim.
Conclusion: The issue was answered in favour of the Revenue.
Issue (iii): Whether the claim for deduction of interest on the loan taken from the State Government required consideration under section 37 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The Court applied the same course as in the assessee's earlier matter, holding that although deduction under section 36(1) was not available, the claim had to be examined under section 37.
Conclusion: The matter was remitted to the Tribunal for consideration under section 37 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Final Conclusion: The assessee succeeded on depreciation, failed on the insurance fund deductions, and the interest deduction claim was sent back for reconsideration under the residuary business expenditure provision.