Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, for imposing penalty for concealment of income under section 271(1)(c), the competent authority is to be identified with reference to the date of filing of the return, the date of initiation of penalty proceedings, or the date of the assessment order, in the light of section 274(2) as amended with effect from 1 April 1971.
Analysis: The concealed income in each year was below the monetary threshold attracting the jurisdiction of the Income-tax Officer after the amendment. The relevant point for determining who can initiate and levy penalty is the date on which the assessment is completed, because it is only then that concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars is found and the competent penal authority can be identified. Since the assessments were made after 1 April 1971, the amended allocation of jurisdiction under section 274(2) applied.
Conclusion: The competent authority was to be determined with reference to the date of the assessment order, and the Income-tax Officer had jurisdiction to levy penalty; the question was answered in favour of the Revenue.
Ratio Decidendi: For penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c), the authority competent to impose penalty is determined by the law in force on the date of the assessment order, because that is the point at which concealment is judicially found and penalty jurisdiction crystallises.