Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the expenditure of Rs. 1 lakh incurred for technical know-how was capital expenditure attributable to the plant and machinery and was, therefore, required to be added to the cost of the capital asset for depreciation purposes.
Analysis: The technical know-how was acquired to enable the assessee to establish and operate a plant in India for manufacture of the relevant linings. The agreement also contemplated the making available of improvements and modifications in the manufacturing methods, and it operated for an unlimited period. These features supported the finding that the expenditure was capital in nature. The addition on a pro rata basis was held to relate to the plant and machinery and not to any other asset, leaving the Assessing Officer to determine the amount to be added to that cost.
Conclusion: The expenditure was held to be capital expenditure and was to be added to the cost of plant and machinery for depreciation purposes, in favour of the Revenue.