Common parlance test classifies electric fans as domestic appliances; penalty arises only after notice under the tax scheme.

Electric fans were held to fall within the expression "domestic electrical appliances" in entry 52 of Schedule B, applying the ordinary commercial or common parlance test rather than a restrictive primary-use approach; the fact that fans may also be used in offices did not take them outside the specific entry, so they were not relegated to the residuary entry 80. On penalty, section 16 was read as an integrated scheme: tax due according to the return had to be paid before furnishing the return, but default for section 16(4) arose only if the dealer failed to comply with notice under section 16(5). Penalty was therefore not attracted merely for non-payment before filing the return.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether electric fans fall within entry 52 of Schedule B to the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1953 as "domestic electrical appliances" or within the residuary entry 80; (ii) Whether penalty under section 16(4) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1953 is attracted for non-payment of tax due according to the return before filing the return, or only on default after notice under section 16(5).

Issue (i): Whether electric fans fall within entry 52 of Schedule B to the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1953 as "domestic electrical appliances" or within the residuary entry 80.

Analysis: The expression "domestic electrical appliances" was held to be governed by the common parlance test and not by any technical or artificial enlargement merely because the entry also excluded torches, torch cells and filament lighting bulbs. The exclusionary words were treated as inserted ex abundanti cautela and not as controlling the natural meaning of the entry. On the ordinary commercial understanding, electric fans are appliances generally used for household purposes, even though they may also be used in offices and other establishments. The Court therefore declined to apply a restrictive primary-use approach and held that the character of a domestic electrical appliance is not lost because the item is capable of other uses.

Conclusion: Electric fans fall within entry 52 and not the residuary entry 80; the finding was in favour of the revenue on this issue and against the assessee.

Issue (ii): Whether penalty under section 16(4) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1953 is attracted for non-payment of tax due according to the return before filing the return, or only on default after notice under section 16(5).

Analysis: Section 16 was read as a connected and integrated scheme. Section 16(2) was held to declare the dealer's liability to pay the tax due according to the return before furnishing the return, but not to prescribe the time for penal default. Section 16(5) was held to prescribe the relevant time for payment where the return is furnished without full payment, and default for the purpose of section 16(4) arises only on failure to comply with the notice issued under section 16(5). The contrary construction was found inconsistent with the structure of the provision and with the treatment of similar provisions in allied sales tax legislation.

Conclusion: Penalty under section 16(4) was not attracted merely because the full tax was not paid before filing the return; liability arose only upon default after notice under section 16(5), so the assessee succeeded on this issue.

Final Conclusion: The reference was answered by upholding the classification of electric fans under the specific entry, but rejecting the levy of penalty in the absence of default after notice under the statutory scheme governing payment and recovery.

Ratio Decidendi: Tax entries are to be construed in their ordinary commercial sense, and a penal provision for non-payment of return-based tax is triggered only when the statute's prescribed mechanism for notice and time for payment is disobeyed.

---