Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a question of law arose for reference under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 on the Tribunal's view that penalty for concealment stood vitiated because Explanation 1 to section 271(1)(c) was not separately invoked in the show-cause notice.
Analysis: The record showed concurrent findings of the appellate authority and the Tribunal that separate invocation of Explanation 1 was necessary while considering levy of penalty. The Court found that this view was prima facie incorrect and that the proposed question required examination by the High Court.
Conclusion: The petition was allowed and the Tribunal was directed to state the case and refer the question of law for the opinion of the Court.