1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter ✕
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Court Invalidates Rejected Declaration, Orders Reconsideration</h1> The court held that the impugned order rejecting the declaration under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998 as invalid was ineffective, as the subsequent ... Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, Reference Issues:Validity of declaration under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998 under the Finance Act, 1998.Analysis:The writ petition challenged the intimation by the respondent that the declaration filed under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998 was invalid. The petitioner, a partnership firm, had faced an addition to its income on account of unexplained cash credits, which was later deleted by the Commissioner of Income-tax but restored by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal. The petitioner filed a reference application seeking questions of law to be referred to the court. The Tribunal passed an ex parte order dismissing the application due to the petitioner's absence. The petitioner filed for a recall of this order, which was granted by the Tribunal. However, before the recall order, the respondent declared the petitioner's declaration under the KVS Scheme as invalid, stating the reference application was rejected on the same day. The key issue was whether the reference application was pending on the date of filing the declaration.The court noted that while the reference application was dismissed on the date of filing the declaration, the subsequent recall order by the Tribunal rendered the initial order non-existent. As a result, the impugned order rejecting the declaration based on the initial order also became ineffective. The court held that in the interest of justice, the impugned order should be vacated, and the matter should be reconsidered by the respondent in light of the fact that the reference application was pending on the date of filing the declaration. The court allowed the writ petition, with no order as to costs. The decision emphasized the importance of due process and ensuring that legal proceedings are conducted fairly and justly.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
