1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Tribunal affirms delay due to flood & soap dish qualifies for duty credit in manufacturing process</h1> The Tribunal rejected the Revenue's appeal, affirming the Commissioner (Appeals)'s decisions regarding the delay in filing the appeal due to a flood and ... Cenvat/Modvat β Revenue contended that the credit of duty doesnot provide in respect of the soap dish in a unipack of soap with dish β Commissioner(Appeals) after considering the details rejected the revenue contention and allow the credit Issues:Delay in filing appeal due to natural calamity, availability of credit of duty for soap dish in a unipack of soap.Delay in filing appeal due to natural calamity:The Commissioner (Appeals) had condoned the delay in filing the appeal against the Order-in-Original due to a flood, considering it a reasonable cause for the delay. The Tribunal found no issue with this decision, stating that there was no infirmity in the Commissioner's view.Availability of credit of duty for soap dish in a unipack of soap:The dispute centered around whether the soap dish in a unipack of soap qualified as an 'input' for availing duty credit. The Commissioner (Appeals) allowed the credit, emphasizing that the soap dish was part of a market strategy to make the soap marketable, thus constituting a manufacturing process. The Tribunal upheld this decision, noting that the unipack containing both soap and dish was a final marketable product subject to excise duty, regardless of the soap's independent marketability.Conclusion:The Tribunal rejected the Revenue's appeal, affirming the Commissioner (Appeals)'s decisions regarding the delay in filing the appeal and the availability of duty credit for the soap dish in a unipack of soap.