Concurrent findings and no substantial question of law bar interference in income-tax appeal

Concurrent factual findings by the appellate authority and the Tribunal sustained deletion of the additions, and the record showed no legal infirmity in their reasoning. The High Court held that, in the absence of a substantial question of law, it would not interfere in an appeal under section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The challenge to the view that section 145(2) was not attracted therefore failed, and the appeal was not entertainable.

---

---

Issues: Whether the Tribunal was justified in deleting the additions made by the Assessing Officer and in holding that the provisions of section 145(2) were not attracted, and whether any substantial question of law arose for consideration in the appeal.

Analysis: The appellate authority had recorded detailed reasons for deleting the additions, and the Tribunal had independently affirmed that view. The record did not disclose any legal infirmity in those concurrent factual findings. In the absence of a substantial question of law, the High Court declined to interfere in an appeal under section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

Conclusion: The challenge to the deletion of additions and to the non-application of section 145(2) failed, and the appeal was not entertainable.

---