Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, for the purpose of additional sales tax under rule 6 of the General Sales Tax Rules, 1950, the expression "the person who in the State is the first dealer in such goods" included the out-of-State supplier from whom the petitioner purchased tobacco in inter-State trade, so as to exclude the petitioner from liability.
Analysis: The liability under section 3(2) of the General Sales Tax Act, 1125, was linked by rule 6 to the first dealer in the State who was not exempt under section 3(3). A dealer whose sales were beyond the taxing power of the State could not be treated as the first dealer for the purpose of the rule. In the context of Article 286(2) of the Constitution of India and the validation available for the relevant period, the rule was construed on its own terms and not as extending to explanation sales through an outside-State supplier. The proper point of taxation was therefore the first intra-State sale by a dealer liable to tax in the State.
Conclusion: The petitioner was liable to the additional tax and the contention that the inter-State supplier was the first dealer was rejected.