1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Appellate Tribunal allows refund for service tax on technical know-how purchase</h1> The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi allowed the appeal, granting refund of service tax paid during the investigation of liability for purchasing ... Refund β Appellant demand for refund which is paid by him as service tax liability is rejected β Authority after considering the detail allow the refund Issues: Denial of refund of service tax paid during investigation of liability for purchase of technical know-how; Interpretation of agreement for Consulting Engineering Service; Refund eligibility based on nature of agreement.Analysis:1. The appeal before the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi was against the denial of a refund of Rs.1,56,250/- paid by the appellant during the investigation of service tax liability related to the purchase of technical know-how from M/s. Lizzini SPA.2. The impugned order concluded that the agreement between the parties was for Consulting Engineering Service, making the service liable to service tax.3. Upon hearing both sides and examining the record, the Tribunal analyzed the relevant portions of the agreement to determine the nature of the transaction.4. The agreement highlighted the grant of an exclusive license, technical information, and assistance for the manufacture and sale of CNC Internal Grinding Machines 'Polar model and its variants'. The agreement did not involve any consultancy element.5. Consequently, the Tribunal held that no service tax was payable by the appellant as per the agreement's nature. The amount paid during the investigation period was deemed refundable. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed, granting consequential relief to the appellant.