Weighted deduction under section 35B denied for Agmark and carriage-related export expenses outside eligible export-promotion categories.

Expenditure qualifies for weighted deduction under section 35B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 only when it falls strictly within the specified export-promotion categories. Agmark coupon expenditure was not incurred exclusively for promoting export sales or furnishing technical information to foreign buyers, and was therefore outside section 35B(1)(b)(viii). Fumigation charges, carriage of export goods, marine insurance and certificate of origin were treated as carriage-related expenses in India and fell outside the eligible categories under section 35B(1)(b)(iii). The disallowance of weighted deduction was upheld for all the items in question.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether expenditure on Agmark coupons qualified for weighted deduction under section 35B of the Income-tax Act, 1961. (ii) Whether fumigation charges, carriage of export goods, marine insurance and certificate of origin qualified for weighted deduction under section 35B of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

Issue (i): Whether expenditure on Agmark coupons qualified for weighted deduction under section 35B of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

Analysis: The expenditure on Agmark was held not to have been incurred exclusively for promoting export sales or for furnishing technical information to foreign buyers. It was found not to fall within section 35B(1)(b)(viii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

Conclusion: The assessee was not entitled to weighted deduction in respect of Agmark expenditure, and this issue was decided against the assessee.

Issue (ii): Whether fumigation charges, carriage of export goods, marine insurance and certificate of origin qualified for weighted deduction under section 35B of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

Analysis: These items were treated as expenses incurred for carriage of goods in India and were held to fall within section 35B(1)(b)(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. On that basis, they were not eligible for weighted deduction under section 35B.

Conclusion: The assessee was not entitled to weighted deduction in respect of these expenditure items, and this issue was decided against the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The reference was answered in favour of the Revenue, and the disallowance of weighted deduction under section 35B was upheld for all the expenditure items in question.

Ratio Decidendi: Expenditure qualifies for weighted deduction under section 35B only if it strictly falls within the specified export-promotion categories; expenses on Agmark and carriage-related items outside those categories are not deductible.

---