Tribunal Rules: Service Tax on Leased Circuit Services Not Applicable, Grants Relief for Specified Period.

The Tribunal set aside the levy of service tax on leased circuit services, allowing the appeal with consequential relief. The Commissioner had confirmed service tax and interest demands under the Finance Act, 1994, but the Tribunal differentiated between telephone services and leased circuits, ruling the latter non-taxable during the specified period.

---

---

Issues Involved:
The issues involved in the judgment are the confirmation of service tax under Section 76 read with Sections 68 and 73 of the Finance Act, 1994, demand of interest under Section 75 for belated payment, and the applicability of service tax on leased circuits.

Confirmation of Service Tax:
The appeal was against the confirmation of service tax amounting to Rs. 2,11,56,278/- for the period from 1-7-94 to 31-7-99 under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994. The Commissioner upheld the demand of service tax as the appellant had collected service tax retrospectively from customers. The service provided by the appellant, in this case, was deemed taxable under the Finance Act, 1994, as clarified by the Ministry of Communications.

Demand of Interest for Belated Payment:
In addition to the service tax demand, there was a further demand of Rs. 99,24,880/- and Rs. 44,84,402/- towards interest under Section 75 of the Finance Act, 1994 for the belated payment of service tax. The Commissioner dropped the demand of service tax/interest on the surcharge amount collected.

Applicability of Service Tax on Leased Circuits:
The appellant contended that service tax on leased circuits is not imposable and collectible, citing a judgment from the Delhi Bench. The appellant argued that service tax was leviable only on telephone services and not on leased circuits until a subsequent amendment to the Finance Act. The Tribunal noted the difference between telephone connections/lines and leased circuits, ultimately setting aside the levy of service tax on leased circuit services and allowing the appeal with consequential relief.

This judgment highlights the interpretation of relevant sections of the Finance Act, 1994, regarding the imposition of service tax, interest on belated payments, and the distinction between taxable telephone services and leased circuits. The Tribunal's decision provides clarity on the applicability of service tax on leased circuits and the retrospective collection of service tax from customers.

---