Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 after the retrospective amendment requiring the agricultural produce to be grown by its members, and whether the Tribunal was right in interfering with the revisional order.
Analysis: The retrospective amendment to section 80P(2)(a)(iii) was held to alter the legal position with effect from 1 April 1968 and to supersede the earlier interpretation that permitted deduction where the produce marketed belonged to members. After the amendment, the statutory requirement was that the agricultural produce must be grown by the members, and it was not enough that it had been grown by members of member societies. Since that requirement was not satisfied, the assessee could not claim the deduction.
Conclusion: The questions were answered against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue, and the deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(iii) was held to be unavailable.