Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether property inherited by the assessee on the death of his father was assessable in the hands of the Hindu undivided family or in his individual capacity.
Analysis: The dispute turned on the effect of section 8 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, on property devolving on a son from his father. The Court followed the principle laid down by the Supreme Court that, after such devolution, the son takes the property in his individual capacity and not as karta of his own Hindu undivided family. The earlier view treating such income as HUF income was held to be incorrect.
Conclusion: The property and the income arising from it were taxable in the hands of the assessee as an individual, not as a Hindu undivided family.
Ratio Decidendi: Property devolving on a son under section 8 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 is received by him in his individual capacity and is not automatically impressed with the character of Hindu undivided family property.