Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Sales tax transferred to profit account is taxable income under Section 41(1)</h1> <h3>Commissioner of Income Tax. Versus Balabus Birla And Co.</h3> Commissioner of Income Tax. Versus Balabus Birla And Co. - [2001] 252 ITR 372, 169 CTR 328, 118 TAXMANN 577 Issues Involved:1. Whether the sum of Rs. 90,279 can be assessed to income-tax during the assessment year 1970-71 under section 41(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:1. Nature of the Amount Collected as Sales Tax:The respondent-assessee collected sales tax at two percent from its customers during the assessment years 1964-65 to 1967-68. This amount was credited to a separate 'General Sales Tax Account' and not included in the profit and loss account. The assessee contended that the amount collected was a deposit from customers and not a trading receipt. The Income-tax Officer disagreed, treating the sales tax collected as a trading receipt and therefore taxable when transferred to the profit and loss account in 1970-71.2. Treatment by the Income-tax Officer:The Income-tax Officer included the amount of Rs. 90,279 in the total income of the assessee for the assessment year 1970-71, arguing that the sales tax collected was a trading receipt. The officer held that the sales tax paid to the Government constituted a trade expenditure, and the ultimate refund of such sales tax amounted to remission of liability or expenditure under section 41(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.3. Appellate Assistant Commissioner's Decision:The appeal by the assessee was dismissed by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner, who affirmed that the sales tax realized along with the sale price was a trading receipt. The Commissioner upheld the view that the sales tax paid constituted a trading expenditure, and the refund of sales tax amounted to remission of liability or expenditure.4. Tribunal's Decision:The Tribunal accepted the assessee's claim, stating that the amount of Rs. 90,279 was not liable to be assessed during the assessment year 1970-71 but should be taxed in the years when the sales tax was actually received. The Tribunal also held that section 41(1) was not applicable since the assessee had not claimed the amount of sales tax paid as a deduction by way of trading expenditure in earlier years.5. High Court's Analysis:The High Court examined whether the sum of Rs. 90,279 could be assessed to income-tax in 1970-71 under section 41(1). The court noted that the assessee followed the mercantile system of accounting and had treated the sales tax collected as a liability or deposit, not including it in the profit and loss account. The court observed that the liability ceased during the assessment year 1970-71 when the sales tax authority accepted the assessee's claim regarding 'combing waste,' making the amount part of the assessee's income and thus taxable.6. Application of Section 41(1):The court held that section 41(1) was applicable. The section provides that if an allowance or deduction has been made in respect of a trading liability and subsequently, the liability ceases, the amount obtained is deemed to be profits and gains of business. The court found that the cessation of liability occurred during the assessment year 1970-71, making the amount taxable.7. Reliance on Precedents:The court referred to the decision in Saraswati Industrial Syndicate's case, where a similar situation was found taxable. The court also distinguished the present case from the Supreme Court decision in CIT v. Sugauli Sugar Works (P.) Ltd., noting that the transfer of the amount was not a unilateral act but followed the acceptance of the assessee's claim by the sales tax authority.8. Conclusion:The High Court concluded that the amount collected by the assessee as sales tax, kept in a separate account, and later transferred to the profit and loss account due to cessation of liability, was exigible to income-tax. The Tribunal had erred in accepting the assessee's claim. The question was answered in favor of the Revenue and against the assessee, with no order as to costs.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found