Nil valuation for film stock does not extend to publicity materials that retain separate business value.

Publicity materials for a film could not be valued at nil in closing stock merely because the film itself qualified for nil valuation under the income-tax rules. The nil-valuation concession applied only to the film after exhibition for the stipulated period and could not be extended by implication to publicity materials, which were not covered by the rules and retained independent value for later use. The assessee's separate treatment of publicity materials as a distinct business, with separate accounts and prior-year stock valuation, reinforced that they remained separately taxable stock-in-trade. The question was answered against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.

---

---

Issues: Whether the publicity materials for a film could be valued at nil in closing stock merely because the film itself was entitled to nil valuation under the income-tax rules.

Analysis: The nil valuation contemplated by the rules applied to the film after exhibition for the stipulated period and could not be extended to publicity materials, which were not mentioned in the rules and which retained independent value for use in subsequent years. The assessee had treated publicity materials as a separate business, maintained separate accounts, and valued their closing stock in earlier years. A concession granted to films as an incentive could not be enlarged by implication to cover allied publicity material.

Conclusion: The publicity materials could not be valued at nil, and the question was answered against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.

---