Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        1999 (4) TMI 11 - HC - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tax Court Upholds Interest on TDS Refund | Error Rectified Under Section 154 The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) order directing the Assessing Officer to allow interest on the refund of TDS payment under ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Tax Court Upholds Interest on TDS Refund | Error Rectified Under Section 154

                            The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) order directing the Assessing Officer to allow interest on the refund of TDS payment under section 154. The court dismissed the Revenue's appeal, citing the necessity of adjusting TDS before advance tax in tax computations as per legal provisions. The error in the computation by the Assessing Officer was found to be apparent and not debatable, justifying rectification under section 154. The court rejected the application for reference, affirming the correctness of the lower authorities' decisions.




                            Issues Involved:

                            1. Whether the Tribunal is right in law and on facts in confirming the order passed by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) allowing the application under section 154 and, thereby directing the Assessing Officer to allow interest on the amount of refund of TDS paymentRs.
                            2. Whether the Tribunal ought not to have appreciated the issue was debatable and the claim could not have been allowed under section 154 of the ActRs.

                            Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Confirmation of the Order under Section 154:

                            The primary issue revolves around the Tribunal's decision to uphold the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) order, which directed the Assessing Officer to allow interest on the amount of refund of TDS payment. The facts of the case reveal that the assessee had deposited advance tax and was also entitled to credit for TDS. Initially, a refund was granted without considering the TDS credit, leading to a subsequent refund order which did not include interest on the additional refund amount. The assessee's application under section 154 sought to rectify this by claiming interest under section 214. The Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax (Assessment) denied the interest, but the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) found this to be erroneous, directing recalculation of interest by first deducting TDS from the tax payable and then considering the advance tax.

                            The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, aligning with the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) and citing the Supreme Court's decision in Modi Industries v. CIT, which clarified that tax paid, including TDS and advance tax, retained by the Assessing Officer and later refunded due to appellate orders, is subject to interest under section 244(1A). The Tribunal's agreement with this interpretation underscores the necessity of adjusting TDS before advance tax in tax computations.

                            2. Debatable Issue and Section 154 Application:

                            The second issue questions whether the Tribunal failed to recognize the debatable nature of the claim, which would preclude its allowance under section 154. The legal provisions of the Income-tax Act are clear that TDS must be adjusted before considering advance tax for computing tax liability. Sections 191, 199, and 209 mandate that advance tax liability is determined after adjusting TDS. The Tribunal and the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) found that the Assessing Officer's method of adjusting advance tax before TDS was contrary to these provisions, making the error apparent and not debatable.

                            The judgment emphasizes that the provisions of the Income-tax Act and the rules framed thereunder clearly dictate the order of adjustments. The mistake in the computation by the Assessing Officer was evident and did not involve weighing different interpretations, thus fitting within the scope of rectification under section 154. The court concluded that the answer to the questions posed was self-evident and did not warrant a reference, as the mistake was apparent and contrary to the Act's clear provisions.

                            Conclusion:

                            The court rejected the application, affirming that the Tribunal correctly upheld the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) order. The error in the computation of refund by the Assessing Officer was apparent and contrary to the Income-tax Act, justifying rectification under section 154. The questions posed were deemed self-evident, and the application for reference was declined.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found