Court limits rectification power to correcting mistakes evident on record, not debatable issues.

The High Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the Tribunal's decision that rectification u/s 154 is not applicable to debatable issues. The court emphasized that errors must be apparent without the need for elaborate arguments, limiting the power of rectification to correcting mistakes evident on the face of the record.

---

---

Issues involved: Appeal u/s 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 regarding deduction under section 80HHC challenged based on retrospective amendment of section 28(iii)(b) by the Finance Act, 1990.

Summary:
The assessee filed a return for the assessment year 1989-90 and received an intimation u/s 143(1)(a) of the Act. Subsequently, action u/s 154 was initiated due to a retrospective amendment affecting the deduction under section 80HHC. The Assessing Officer reduced the deduction, leading to appeals up to the Tribunal. The Tribunal held that section 154 was not applicable in this case, stating that the issue was debatable and not suitable for prima facie adjustment u/s 143(1)(a). The Tribunal emphasized that rectification u/s 154 is not for debatable issues. The High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision, noting that section 154 does not apply to debatable matters and that the error must be apparent without the need for extensive arguments. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed as the matter was not suitable for rectification u/s 154.

In conclusion, the High Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the Tribunal's decision that rectification u/s 154 is not applicable to debatable issues and errors must be apparent without the need for elaborate arguments. The court emphasized that the power u/s 154 is limited to correcting mistakes that are evident on the face of the record, similar to the High Court's authority to address errors based on the record's face.

---