1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>High Court rules in favor of Government corporation on deduction calculation under Income-tax Act</h1> The High Court of Allahabad ruled in favor of the respondent-assessee, a Government corporation, in a case concerning the interpretation of deduction ... Business Expenditure Issues:Interpretation of deduction under section 36(1)(viii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.Analysis:The High Court of Allahabad was presented with a question regarding the correct application of deduction under section 36(1)(viii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The issue revolved around whether the deduction should be regulated with reference to the total income computed before making any deduction under the same section of the Act. The reference pertained to the assessment years 1983-84 and 1984-85.The respondent-assessee, a Government corporation, claimed a deduction under section 36(1)(viii) based on 40% of the gross total income for the mentioned assessment years. The dispute arose when the assessing authority allowed the deduction at the rate of 40% on the total income computed before any deduction under Chapter VI-A but after allowing deduction under section 36(1)(viii) of the Act. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) directed that the relief under section 36(1)(viii) should be granted to the appellant based on previous appellate orders.Subsequently, the Department appealed against the orders of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), leading to the Tribunal endorsing the view that the deduction under section 36(1)(viii) should be regulated with reference to the total income computed before making any deduction under the same section of the Income-tax Act. The Tribunal relied on its previous decisions and dismissed the Departmental appeals.In its analysis, the High Court referred to the decision of the apex court in CIT v. Kerala State Industrial Development Corporation [1998] 233 ITR 197. The apex court had clarified that in computing the total income for the purpose of section 36(1)(viii) of the Act, the total income should be calculated in accordance with the provisions of sections 30 to 43A except section 36(1)(viii) of the Act. Following the apex court's decision, the High Court ruled in favor of the assessee and against the Revenue, affirming that the deduction under section 36(1)(viii) should be regulated with reference to the total income computed before making any deduction under the same section of the Income-tax Act. No costs were awarded in the judgment.