TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Kerala High Court: Membership Fees for Yacht Club a Capital Expenditure</h1> <h3>Framatone Connector Oen Limited Versus Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Assessment).</h3> The High Court of Kerala upheld the Tribunal's decision that the payment made by the assessee for institutional membership in the Cochin Yacht Club ... - Issues Involved: Determination of whether the amount paid by the assessee for institutional membership in a club is a capital expenditure not allowable as business expenditure under the Income-tax Act.Summary:The High Court of Kerala heard an appeal filed by the assessee under section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, challenging the order of the Tribunal regarding the disallowance of Rs. 45,000 paid for institutional membership in the Cochin Yacht Club. The Assessing Officer disallowed the claim, but the Commissioner (Appeals) allowed it. The Tribunal, however, considered the payment as capital expenditure, reversing the Commissioner's decision. The High Court concurred with the Tribunal's view, stating that the payment for membership resulted in an enduring benefit to the institution, making it capital in nature. Citing the Punjab State Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. v. CIT case, the court emphasized that such expenditures, made for an enduring benefit of a trade, are properly attributable to capital. Therefore, the court ruled in favor of the Revenue, dismissing the appeal.In this case, the issue revolved around the nature of the expenditure made by the assessee for institutional membership in the Cochin Yacht Club. The court examined whether the payment of Rs. 45,000 constituted a capital expenditure or a business expenditure under the Income-tax Act.The court analyzed the Tribunal's decision that the payment for membership in the club was capital in nature, providing an enduring benefit to the institution. The court referred to the principle established in the Punjab State Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. v. CIT case, emphasizing that expenditures made for an enduring benefit of a trade are properly attributable to capital, not revenue.Ultimately, the court agreed with the Tribunal's assessment that the payment for institutional membership in the club was a capital expenditure. As such, the court ruled in favor of the Revenue and against the assessee, dismissing the appeal filed under section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
