Time limit for income tax notice under section 143(2) clarified by Finance Act, 2006

The case involved a dispute over the time limit for issuing a notice under section 143(2) of the Income-tax Act for the assessment year 1996-97. The Tribunal held that the notice issued beyond the twelve-month limit rendered the assessment invalid. However, the Finance Act, 2006, introduced a proviso stating that such notices served after the limit shall be deemed valid for returns filed between October 1, 1991, and September 30, 2005. The judgment emphasized the mandatory nature of the time limit for notices post-2005 and remanded the matter for further assessment, setting aside the Tribunal's decision based on limitation.

---

---

Issues involved:
The judgment addresses the question of law regarding the time-limit for issuing a notice under section 143(2) in relation to a return filed under section 139 or in response to a notice under section 148 of the Income-tax Act for the assessment year 1996-97.

Assessment Proceedings:
The assessee filed her return of income on July 16, 1998, following a notice under section 148. The Assessing Officer found discrepancies in the source of funds for a property purchase and requested proof of cash credits. The appellate authority dismissed the appeal as the claim was unsubstantiated. The Tribunal considered the legality of assessment proceedings, noting that the notice under section 143(2) was issued beyond the twelve-month limit, deeming the assessment invalid.

Legal Interpretation - Section 143(2):
The Tribunal's decision was based on the interpretation of section 143(2) and the applicability of the time limit specified therein. The Tribunal held that the provisions of section 143(2) are not limited to returns filed under section 139 only, but also apply to proceedings initiated under section 148. The Tribunal's decision was contrary to the Revenue's reliance on a decision from the Agra Bench of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal.

Proviso to Section 148 - Finance Act, 2006:
The Finance Act, 2006, inserted a proviso to section 148, stating that where a return was filed in response to a notice under section 148 between October 1, 1991, and September 30, 2005, and a notice under section 143(2) was served after the twelve-month limit, such notice shall be deemed valid. The Tribunal's cancellation of the assessment based on limitation was deemed unsustainable in light of this proviso.

Retrospective Amendment and Remand:
The retrospective amendment introduced in the proviso clarified that the requirement of notice under section 143(2) within the specified time limit is mandatory for returns filed after October 1, 2005. The judgment remitted the matter back to the Tribunal for a decision on the merits of the assessee's claim, allowing the appeal and setting aside the Tribunal's decision based on limitation.

---