Just a moment...
We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
- Overview Summary
- Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
- Relevant Case Laws
- Tariff / Classification / HSN
- Expert views from TaxTMI
- Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the penalty imposed under section 36(2) of the Assam Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1939, on the petitioner for alleged default in payment of agricultural income-tax could be sustained when no notice to show cause or opportunity of hearing was given as required by the proviso to section 36(2).
Analysis: Section 36 makes an assessee a defaulter if dues are not paid by the date specified and empowers the assessing authority to recover an additional penalty not exceeding the amount in default; however, the proviso to section 36(2) mandates that no order imposing penalty shall be made unless the assessee has been heard or given a reasonable opportunity of being heard. The power to impose penalty is discretionary and cannot be exercised arbitrarily; the authority must give the assessee an opportunity to show cause, consider relevant factors objectively, and record reasons before imposing penalty. In the present case, the respondents did not produce any notice or material showing that the requisite show-cause notice or hearing was afforded prior to imposing the penalty, and the letters demanding payment which included penalty amounts could not legally substitute for the statutory opportunity to be heard under the proviso to section 36(2).
Conclusion: The penalty imposed under section 36(2) of the Assam Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1939, is set aside for want of compliance with the proviso to section 36(2); the demands for tax and interest are not disturbed.