Unstayed appellate tax order must be followed; further pre-deposit cannot be insisted on without considering cumulative liability.

An un-stayed Special Bench order reducing the assessee's tax liability had to be given effect by subordinate authorities under judicial discipline, and the appellate authority was not justified in insisting on further deposit without considering the cumulative liability across the relevant assessment years. The text notes that the assessee had already paid amounts exceeding the tax that would remain payable if that operative order were applied, so a year-wise approach in isolation was inappropriate. Interim protection was therefore granted against the additional deposit, and the appeal was to be heard without insisting on any further pre-deposit.

---

---

Issues: Whether, for the assessment year 2003-04, the assessee could be required to deposit the assessed demand in the face of an un-stayed Special Bench order reducing its tax liability for earlier assessment years, and whether the appellate authority was bound to take the cumulative position into account while considering stay.

Analysis: The Special Bench order in the assessee's own case had reduced the tax liability and had not been stayed. The Tribunal had already applied that order while granting interim relief for other assessment years, reflecting the principle that subordinate authorities must follow higher appellate orders in accordance with judicial discipline. A year-wise approach in isolation would ignore the broader picture where the dispute for the relevant assessment years was still alive and where the assessee had already paid amounts exceeding the tax that would be due if the Special Bench order were implemented. The lack of stay of the Special Bench order was material, and the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) ought not to have insisted on further deposit without considering the cumulative effect.

Conclusion: The requirement to deposit Rs. 4.86 crores was stayed, and the appellate authority was directed to hear the assessee's appeal without insisting on any deposit.

Final Conclusion: The assessee was granted interim protection against further deposit because judicial discipline required the operative appellate ruling to be respected until set aside or stayed.

Ratio Decidendi: An un-stayed order of a higher appellate authority must be followed by subordinate authorities, and interim tax demands should be assessed in light of the operative cumulative liability where the earlier appellate determination materially reduces the assessee's overall exposure.

---