Assessment Order Nullified for 2004-05: Non-compliance with Section 153A Invalidates Post-Search Proceedings.

The HC declared the assessment order for the year 2004-05 a nullity due to non-compliance with Section 153A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court found the proceedings post-search invalid as no notice under Section 153A was issued. The writ application was allowed, setting aside the impugned notice and assessment order. The respondents were instructed to conduct a block assessment in accordance with Section 153A, ensuring legal compliance and providing the petitioner an opportunity to be heard.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Validity of the impugned notice issued under Section 142(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
2. Jurisdiction and legality of the assessment proceedings for the assessment year 2004-05 post-search and seizure operations.
3. Compliance with the provisions of Section 153A of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Validity of the Impugned Notice Issued Under Section 142(1):
The petitioner, an assessee, challenged the notice issued under Section 142(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, seeking to quash it. The petitioner argued that the notice was invalid as it pertained to an assessment year for which the return had already been filed voluntarily under Section 139(1), along with relevant financial documents. The court examined Section 142, which empowers the assessing authority to make inquiries before assessment by issuing notices to the assessee. However, the court noted that the issuance of such a notice must comply with the procedural requirements specified in the Act.

2. Jurisdiction and Legality of the Assessment Proceedings for the Assessment Year 2004-05 Post-Search and Seizure Operations:
The petitioner contended that the assessment proceedings for the year 2004-05 were illegal and without jurisdiction, as no notice under Section 153A had been issued. The court reviewed the sequence of events, including the search and seizure operations conducted on August 24, 2006, and subsequent notices issued under Section 142. The court emphasized that Section 153A mandates the issuance of a notice to the assessee for furnishing returns for six assessment years preceding the year of the search. The respondents admitted that no such notice was issued, which led the court to conclude that the pending assessment proceedings for 2004-05 should have abated as per the second proviso to Section 153A.

3. Compliance with the Provisions of Section 153A of the Income-tax Act, 1961:
The court delved into the provisions of Sections 153A, 153B, and 153C, which deal with assessments in cases of search and requisition. Section 153A requires the Assessing Officer to issue a notice for filing returns for six assessment years prior to the year of the search. The court noted that the pending assessment proceedings for these years would abate upon the initiation of a search. The court further explained that the term "abate" means to nullify or put an end to ongoing proceedings. Given that no notice under Section 153A was issued, the court held that the continuation of the assessment proceedings and the final assessment order for 2004-05 were illegal and without jurisdiction.

Conclusion:
The court concluded that the entire process adopted by the respondents in continuing with the assessment proceedings post-search without issuing the requisite notice under Section 153A was vitiated by law. Consequently, the impugned assessment order dated December 28, 2006, was declared a nullity. The court allowed the writ application, setting aside the impugned notice and the final assessment order. The respondents were directed to proceed with the block assessment after issuing notices as required under Section 153A, ensuring compliance with legal provisions and providing the petitioner an opportunity to be heard.

---