Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether repacking bulk coconut oil into smaller retail packs changed its classification from fixed vegetable oil under Heading 15.03 to preparation for use on hair under sub-heading 3305.90, and whether such repacking amounted to manufacture.
Analysis: The competing entries had to be applied by reference to the tariff headings and the relevant chapter notes. The product was coconut oil supplied in bulk and only repacked into smaller containers, without addition of ingredients or further processing. The reasoning turned on whether the goods satisfied the conditions for Chapter 33, including packing or presentation indicating use as cosmetics or toilet preparations or a form clearly specialised for such use. The binding effect of departmental circulars, prior tribunal decisions, and the scope of the relevant chapter notes were considered. On the facts, the smaller packs did not by themselves satisfy the conditions for classification under Chapter 33, whereas the oil continued to answer the description of fixed vegetable oil under Chapter 15. Repacking from bulk to retail packs, without more, did not convert the product into hair oil for tariff purposes.
Conclusion: The product was classifiable under Heading 15.03 and not under sub-heading 3305.90, and repacking did not make it dutiable as a separate manufactured preparation for use on the hair.