Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the reversal of Modvat credit entries made to comply with DEEC requirements could be restored by recredit, and whether the claim for such restoration was barred by Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944.
Analysis: The reversal of credit was not made under the Central Excise Act, 1944 or the rules made thereunder, but only to satisfy the requirements connected with DEEC benefits. Section 11B, which governs refund of duty of excise, was therefore not attracted. Since the amounts had been reversed in excess of what was required and the quantum was undisputed, the assessee was entitled to recredit the excess entries so that the RG 23(A) accounts could be kept in order. The restoration could be made without a refund application and on a suo motu basis.
Conclusion: The time-bar objection under Section 11B was rejected, and the assessee was held entitled to take recredit of the excess reversed amounts.