Exchange fluctuation and import entitlement receipts treated as taxable under the Income-tax Act, against the assessee.

Exchange difference on the relevant asset was treated as capital expenditure under section 43A, not as allowable revenue expenditure under sections 28 and 37, applying the settled principle governing exchange variation. The issue was decided for the Revenue and against the assessee. Receipt from sale of import entitlements was held to fall within section 28(iiia) and to be assessable as business income, without requiring further inquiry into other authorities. That issue was also decided for the Revenue and against the assessee. Both referred questions were answered against the assessee and the reference was disposed of accordingly.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the exchange difference of Rs.2,75,533 constituted capital expenditure under section 43A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, or an allowable revenue expenditure under sections 28 and 37 of the Act; (ii) Whether the receipt from sale of import entitlements of Rs.7,38,634 constituted business income assessable under the Income-tax Act, 1961.

Issue (i): Whether the exchange difference of Rs.2,75,533 constituted capital expenditure under section 43A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, or an allowable revenue expenditure under sections 28 and 37 of the Act.

Analysis: The question was governed by the settled principle applied by the apex court in relation to exchange variation and its tax treatment. On that basis, the difference in exchange was treated as falling within capital expenditure and not as allowable revenue expenditure.

Conclusion: The issue was answered in favour of the Revenue and against the assessee.

Issue (ii): Whether the receipt from sale of import entitlements of Rs.7,38,634 constituted business income assessable under the Income-tax Act, 1961.

Analysis: The receipt was considered in light of section 28(iiia) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, which governed the tax treatment of such receipts and made the matter clear without further inquiry into other authorities.

Conclusion: The issue was answered in favour of the Revenue and against the assessee.

Final Conclusion: Both referred questions were decided against the assessee, and the reference was disposed of accordingly.

Ratio Decidendi: Exchange fluctuation differences on the relevant asset are to be treated according to the settled statutory and judicial framework for capital expenditure, and receipts from sale of import entitlements are taxable as business income where section 28(iiia) applies.

---