Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Tribunal's view that the assessee was taxable only on her own share and not on the shares attributable to the daughters under the will gave rise to a referable question of law under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The dispute turned on the effect of the will and the factual conclusion drawn by the Tribunal that the income attributable to the daughters was received by the assessee only as a representative arrangement under the testamentary disposition, and that the shares were to be excluded from her assessable income. The Court accepted that the Tribunal had decided the matter on the factual matrix of the will and the inherited rights, and that the Revenue's proposed question did not involve any separate legal controversy.
Conclusion: No referable question of law arose and the Revenue's applications under section 256(2) were rightly rejected.
Final Conclusion: The determination of the assessee's taxability was left undisturbed because the Tribunal's finding was treated as one of fact, not law.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the Tribunal decides the tax consequence of a testamentary arrangement on the facts of the case, and no independent legal issue survives, no question of law is referable under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.