Appeal Allowed Despite Delay Due to No Mala Fide Intent The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI allowed the appeal despite a 70-day delay, as there was no mala fide intent. The delay was condoned in the ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Appeal Allowed Despite Delay Due to No Mala Fide Intent
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI allowed the appeal despite a 70-day delay, as there was no mala fide intent. The delay was condoned in the interest of justice, following the precedent set by the Apex Court in N. Balakrishnan v. M. Krishnamurthy.
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI allowed the appeal with a delay of 70 days due to no mala fide or deliberate delay by the appellant. The delay was condoned in the interest of justice as there was no prejudice to the revenue. The decision followed the ratio laid down by the Apex Court in the case of N. Balakrishnan v. M. Krishnamurthy. (2009 (5) TMI 812 - CESTAT NEW DELHI)
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.