Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee's appeal relating to canteen sales survived the Commercial Tax Officer's suo motu revision, and whether the disputed canteen turnover was liable to sales tax.
Analysis: The pending appeal was not destroyed merely because the assessing authority later exercised revisional power over another part of the assessment. The revisional order did not in fact adjudicate the canteen turnover, and the authorities below erred in treating the original appellate remedy as exhausted. The assessment could not be treated as finally concluded against the assessee on the disputed canteen item when that item had never been effectively decided in appeal or revision. In view of the settled position that canteen sales of this nature were not taxable turnover, the Tribunal ought to have examined the assessee's challenge to that item and granted appropriate relief.
Conclusion: The assessee's challenge succeeded; the disputed canteen turnover was directed to be deleted from the assessment and the appeal was allowed.
Ratio Decidendi: A pending appeal on an item of turnover is not rendered nugatory merely because the assessing authority later revises the assessment on other items; where the disputed item has not been effectively adjudicated, appellate relief remains available and the non-taxable turnover must be excluded.