Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, after the Mysore Sales Tax Act, 1948 was repealed by the Mysore Sales Tax Act, 1957, the State could continue prosecution for offences alleged to have been committed under the repealed Act.
Analysis: The saving provision in section 40(1) of the Mysore Sales Tax Act, 1957 preserved the previous operation of the repealed enactments, liabilities incurred thereunder, and any penalty or punishment incurred in respect of offences committed against them. It also expressly saved any investigation, legal proceeding or remedy in respect of such liability or punishment, and permitted such proceedings to be instituted, continued or enforced as if the new Act had not been passed. The offence alleged against the respondent was one punishable under section 20(1)(a) of the Mysore Sales Tax Act, 1948, and the repeal did not extinguish the State's right to prosecute for that pre-repeal offence.
Conclusion: The prosecution was saved by the repealing and saving clause, and the acquittal ordered by the Magistrate could not stand.