Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether reassessment under section 16 of the Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1959 was valid where turnover had escaped assessment in the original order.
Analysis: The original assessment order did not show any conscious adjudication excluding the hire-purchase turnover from tax. A note in the file could not override the assessment order itself. On the face of the assessment, the assessing authority accepted the return without bringing the entire taxable turnover to charge. That amounted to escapement of tax within the meaning of section 16(1). The reassessment was therefore within jurisdiction, and it was unnecessary to decide the broader question whether section 16 could be invoked where the officer had earlier consciously decided the taxability against the revenue.
Conclusion: Reassessment under section 16(1) was valid and the challenge to the reassessment failed.
Final Conclusion: The revision succeeded because the turnover had escaped assessment and the department was entitled to reopen and reassess the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the original assessment does not disclose a conscious decision on the taxability of particular turnover, omission to assess that turnover constitutes escapement of assessment and can be corrected by reassessment under the statutory escapement provision.