Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether copra was separately taxable under the relevant sales tax entry and amendment, or whether the entry treating cocoanut as including copra showed that copra was not intended to be taxed independently.
Analysis: The relevant schedule entry described cocoanut as including copra. The later amendment and its objects and reasons showed that the legislative intent was to remove doubt and not to impose a separate tax on copra where cocoanut had already been brought to tax. The reasoning previously adopted for cashewnut including its kernel was applied to the present entry, because the wording of the entry and the amendment indicated that the inclusive expression covered the commodity as a whole rather than creating a separate taxable point for the derivative product.
Conclusion: Copra was not separately taxable on the turnover relating to its last purchase, and the assessment to that extent had to be vacated.
Final Conclusion: The revision was allowed and the assessment was set aside to the extent it treated copra as separately taxable.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a taxing entry uses inclusive language and the statutory amendment or its objects and reasons show an intent to remove doubt rather than enlarge the charge, the entry must be construed as taxing the commodity as a whole and not its separately derived form.