Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an order passed by a Magistrate acting under section 13(3)(b) of the Mysore Sales Tax Act, 1957 for recovery of sales tax arrears is a judicial order amenable to revision under the Code of Criminal Procedure, and whether a reference under section 438 of that Code is competent.
Analysis: The assessment machinery under the Act provides the dealer full opportunities to challenge liability and quantum of tax through appeal and revision within the taxing statute. The proceeding under section 13(3)(b) arises only after the tax has been finally determined and is confined to recovery of the amount as if it were a fine. The Magistrate does not decide the validity or extent of the tax claim, but merely takes steps for recovery in the designated manner. Such a function is ministerial and executive in character, and the Magistrate acts as a persona designate under the Act rather than as a court exercising authority under the Code of Criminal Procedure. In the absence of any statutory provision conferring a revision against such an order, the revisional powers under sections 435, 436, 438 and 439 of the Code cannot be invoked.
Conclusion: The order under section 13(3)(b) is not revisable under the Code of Criminal Procedure, and the reference under section 438 was incompetent.
Ratio Decidendi: A Magistrate acting solely for recovery of tax dues under a special statute functions as a persona designate in a ministerial capacity, so the resulting order is not an order of an inferior criminal court and is not subject to criminal revisional jurisdiction unless the statute expressly provides otherwise.