Assessee entitled to allowances for leasing equipment despite not engaged in manufacturing. The High Court of Madras ruled in favor of the assessee for the assessment year 1983-84 under the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court held that the assessee, ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Assessee entitled to allowances for leasing equipment despite not engaged in manufacturing.
The High Court of Madras ruled in favor of the assessee for the assessment year 1983-84 under the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court held that the assessee, involved in leasing earth-moving equipment for industrial activity, is entitled to allowances despite not being directly engaged in manufacturing, referencing the case of CIT v. Shaan Finance (P.) Ltd.
The High Court of Madras ruled in favor of the assessee for the assessment year 1983-84 under the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court cited the decision in the case of CIT v. Shaan Finance (P.) Ltd. and concluded that the assessee, engaged in leasing earth-moving equipment for industrial activity, is eligible for allowances even if not directly engaged in manufacturing.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.