Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2001 (8) TMI 27 - HC - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        High Court Invalidates Wealth-tax Assessment Orders; Emphasizes Mandatory Reasons for Notices The High Court upheld the decisions of the CIT(A) and the Tribunal, confirming that the assessment orders under section 16(4) of the Wealth-tax Act were ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
                          Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

                            High Court Invalidates Wealth-tax Assessment Orders; Emphasizes Mandatory Reasons for Notices

                            The High Court upheld the decisions of the CIT(A) and the Tribunal, confirming that the assessment orders under section 16(4) of the Wealth-tax Act were invalid and void ab initio due to the lack of recorded reasons before issuing notices under section 17. The Court emphasized that the requirement to record reasons before issuing notices became mandatory only from April 1, 1989, and as the notices in question were issued after this date, the amended provisions applied. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed, with the Assessing Officer retaining the right to take remedial measures as per the law.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Validity of assessment orders under section 16(4) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957.
                            2. Requirement of recording reasons before issuing notices under section 17(1) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957, for assessment years prior to April 1, 1989.

                            Detailed Analysis:

                            Issue 1: Validity of Assessment Orders Under Section 16(4) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957

                            The appeals pertain to the assessment years 1981-82 to 1988-89. The Department, based on information indicating that the assessee possessed wealth that had escaped assessment, issued notices under section 17 of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957, to the legal heirs of the assessee on September 12, 1990. The assessee did not respond to these notices, leading to the issuance of a notice under section 16(2) of the Act, which was responded to by the authorized representative of the assessee. However, the assessee failed to comply with the requirement to file a wealth return, resulting in the completion of the assessment ex parte under section 16(4) of the Act.

                            The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) (CIT(A)) held that the assessment orders were invalid and ab initio void because the notices under section 17 were issued without recording the reasons, a mandatory requirement as per the proviso to subsection (1) of section 17 of the Act. The Tribunal upheld this decision, leading to the Revenue's appeal to the High Court.

                            Issue 2: Requirement of Recording Reasons Before Issuing Notices Under Section 17(1) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957

                            The Revenue contended that the Tribunal erred in holding that recording of reasons was a condition precedent even under the unamended provisions of section 17 of the Act, which did not require recording of reasons before issuing a notice prior to April 1, 1989. The appellant argued that the law applicable in the relevant assessment years (1981-82 to 1988-89) did not mandate recording reasons before issuing notices under section 17.

                            The High Court examined section 17(1) of the Wealth-tax Act and its proviso, which mandates that the Assessing Officer shall record his reasons before issuing any notice under this sub-section. This provision came into effect from April 1, 1989. The Court noted that the use of the word "shall" in the proviso makes recording of reasons mandatory. However, up to March 31, 1989, recording of reasons was not mandatory under the Wealth-tax Act.

                            The Court found that the notices under section 17 for the assessment years 1981-82 to 1988-89 were issued on September 12, 1990, and thus, the substituted provisions of section 17, effective from April 1, 1989, applied. The Tribunal and the CIT(A) correctly held that the issuance of notices without recording reasons rendered the assessments invalid and void ab initio.

                            The Court referred to the judgment of the Madras High Court in K. R. Venkatesalu v. WTO, which held that the amended provisions of section 17, effective from April 1, 1989, governed cases where notices were issued after this date.

                            Conclusion:

                            The High Court upheld the decisions of the CIT(A) and the Tribunal, confirming that the assessment orders under section 16(4) of the Act were invalid and void ab initio due to the lack of recorded reasons before issuing notices under section 17. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed, but the Court reserved the right of the Assessing Officer to take remedial measures as per the law.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found