TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>High Court quashes conviction of Vijayam & Co. under IPC SS174. No offense found. Tax Officer lacked authority.</h1> <h3>Vijayam & Co., In re</h3> Vijayam & Co., In re - [1962] 13 STC 504 (Mad) Issues:- Conviction under section 174, Indian Penal Code- Legal obligation to produce account books for the year 1954-55Conviction under section 174, Indian Penal Code:The judgment revolves around the conviction of Messrs Vijayam and Co. under section 174, Indian Penal Code, by the Fourth Presidency Magistrate. The company was accused of not complying with a summons to produce account books for the year 1954-55. However, it was argued that the offense, if any, committed by the company falls under section 175, Indian Penal Code, as they were summoned only to produce account books. The High Court concluded that the company's actions did not amount to an offense under section 174, Indian Penal Code, and therefore, set aside the conviction.Legal obligation to produce account books for the year 1954-55:The key issue examined in the judgment was whether Messrs Vijayam and Co. were legally bound to produce their account books for the specified year. The Commercial Tax Officer had summoned the accounts for the purpose of rectification and examining claims for exemption allowed for the year 1954-55. However, the Court found that the Commercial Tax Officer did not have the necessary authority to summon the accounts for a departmental inquiry or to inspect claims of exemptions. It was highlighted that the powers of revision and rectification lay with higher authorities such as the Deputy Commissioner and the Board of Revenue, not with the Commercial Tax Officer. As a result, the Court ruled that there was no legal obligation for the company to produce their account books, leading to the setting aside of the conviction under section 174, Indian Penal Code.
TaxTMI 