TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the sale value of tanned hides and skins could be taxed where the raw hides and skins had not suffered tax at a fixed purchase point under the rules. (ii) Whether the turnover arising from sales of raw hides and skins to foreign buyers through local banks could be treated as purchases within the State by the foreign buyers or otherwise escape levy under the rules and Article 286 of the Constitution of India.
Issue (i): Whether the sale value of tanned hides and skins could be taxed where the raw hides and skins had not suffered tax at a fixed purchase point under the rules.
Analysis: The scheme of section 5 and the Turnover and Assessment Rules fixed only one taxable point in the alternative. Under rule 16(1), untanned hides and skins were taxable at the stage of the last purchaser in the State. Where that point was not attracted, rule 16(2)(ii) applied to tanned hides and skins and levied tax on the first dealer in such hides and skins in the State. The rules did not permit the department to ignore the unavailable purchase point and nonetheless levy tax at the later tanned stage when no prior tax had been levied on the raw goods.
Conclusion: The sale value of the tanned hides and skins was validly brought to tax, and the contention against the levy failed.
Issue (ii): Whether the turnover arising from sales of raw hides and skins to foreign buyers through local banks could be treated as purchases within the State by the foreign buyers or otherwise escape levy under the rules and Article 286 of the Constitution of India.
Analysis: The asserted banking arrangement did not establish that the foreign buyers became the last purchasers in the State. The transactions were sales in the course of export and were constitutionally protected from direct levy as export sales, but the tax in question was not on the export sale itself. Under rule 16(1), liability attached to the last purchaser in the State, and on the facts the petitioners remained the last purchasers before export. The levy therefore fell within the rule and did not infringe the export protection.
Conclusion: The assessment on the raw hides and skins turnover was justified and the challenge failed.
Final Conclusion: The single-point levy under the rules was upheld, the challenges to the assessments were rejected, and all petitions were dismissed with costs.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a sales tax scheme fixes a single taxable point in the alternative, tax may be levied only at the point actually prescribed by the rules, and an export-related transaction does not displace liability on the last purchaser in the State unless the statutory conditions for shifting the point of levy are satisfied.
TaxTMI 
