Retrospective sales tax validation for dissolved firms sustains assessments under the amended U.P. scheme.

The note explains that the U.P. sales tax amendments were drafted to cover assessment of firms that had discontinued business, and that the later validating clause gave those changes retrospective effect for periods before commencement of the amending Act. It further states that assessments or orders relating to a period before discontinuance were treated as valid under the amended scheme, and that the commencement-date reference was read as marking when the earlier words stood deleted rather than limiting the power to assess dissolved firms. The legislative intent was therefore presented as clearly retrospective, with the validation provision preserving the impugned assessments.

---

---

Issues: Whether a dissolved firm could be assessed under the U.P. sales tax law on the strength of the amended and validating provisions, and whether the retrospective operation of those provisions was ultra vires because the firm had dissolved before the relevant amendment dates.

Analysis: The amendment to the principal sales tax enactment inserted a provision enabling assessment of tax payable by a firm that had discontinued business, and the later amendment expressly provided that the relevant changes were to apply to assessments for any period before commencement of the amending Act. The validating provision further declared that assessments or orders made before or after the earlier amendment relating to a period prior to discontinuance were to be treated as valid as if made under the amended provision. The challenged date reference in the commencement clause was read as fixing the effective point from which the offending words stood deleted, not as limiting the power to assess dissolved firms only from that date. The legislative intent to operate retrospectively was held to be clear from the language of the proviso and the validation clause.

Conclusion: The retrospective amendment was held to be valid, and assessments of the dissolved firm were upheld.

Final Conclusion: The writ petitions failed because the amended sales tax provisions were construed as authorising assessment of dissolved firms retrospectively, with the validating clause sustaining the impugned assessments.

Ratio Decidendi: Where the legislature clearly provides retrospective operation and a validating clause, omitted words in an earlier taxing provision are to be treated as deleted for the effective period, and assessments made in accordance with the amended scheme remain valid.

---