Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the additional sum demanded from the dealer was a penalty attracting the safeguards of section 15-A of the U.P. Sales Tax Act, and whether failure to comply with the conditions attached to the exemption arrangement rendered the dealer liable to sales tax.
Analysis: The exemption fee arrangement was treated as a concession and not as a vested right. The dealer was required to comply fully with the conditions attached to the concession, including deposit of the balance amount fixed earlier. The further amount demanded under the Government's later concession was characterised as a compounding fee, giving the defaulting dealer an opportunity to regularise the default. On that view, section 15-A, which governs levy of penalty, had no application to the amount demanded for availing the concession. Since the dealer did not satisfy the conditions for retaining the exemption benefit, he lost the concession and became liable to pay sales tax.
Conclusion: The demand was not governed by section 15-A of the U.P. Sales Tax Act and no prior sanction or notice under that provision was necessary; the dealer remained liable for sales tax, and the writ petition failed.
Final Conclusion: The challenge to recovery of sales tax was rejected because the dealer did not comply with the conditions of the exemption scheme and could not insist on the concession without fulfilling the stipulated terms.
Ratio Decidendi: A statutory or administrative tax concession must be strictly complied with on its own terms, and a further amount imposed as a condition for availing or retaining that concession is not necessarily a statutory penalty attracting the procedural safeguards applicable to penalties.