Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Commissioner of Sales Tax had authority to revise an assessment order made before the amending Act came into force, in view of the amended limitation in section 24(4) of the Bihar Sales Tax Act.
Analysis: The right of revision was treated as a substantive and vested right arising at the latest on the date of assessment. A later amendment imposing a four-year limitation could not be applied to take away or impair that vested right unless the statute clearly expressed such an intention by express words or necessary implication. The principle was applied in the same manner as cases dealing with vested rights of appeal and other accrued rights, where amendment affecting the exercise of the right was held not to operate retrospectively against proceedings already commenced.
Conclusion: The amended section 24(4) did not apply, and the Commissioner was competent to revise the order.
Final Conclusion: The reference was answered against the assessee, and the order of revision was upheld as not barred by the amended limitation provision.
Ratio Decidendi: A statutory right of revision that has vested at the commencement of the proceedings or at the time of assessment cannot be defeated by a subsequent amendment imposing a new limitation, unless the legislature clearly indicates retrospective application.