Exemption entry interpretation: "exclusively" qualified the dealer, so Halwai-made articles stayed exempt despite other sales.

An exemption entry in Schedule B was construed by grammatical placement: the word "exclusively" was held to qualify the dealer, not the articles sold. On that reading, a Halwai could sell exempt goods ordinarily prepared by Halwais and also other taxable or separately exempt commodities without losing the exemption for the former. Sales of articles ordinarily prepared by Halwais were therefore not liable to tax merely because the dealer also dealt in sugar or other goods, and assessment on the entire gross turnover was not justified.

---

---

Issues: Whether the words "sold by Halwais exclusively" in item 50 of Schedule B to the Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948 qualify the dealer or the articles, and whether sales of articles ordinarily prepared by Halwais, along with separately exempt sugar, could be taxed on the entire turnover.

Analysis: Item 50 exempted articles ordinarily prepared by Halwais when sold by Halwais exclusively. The expression "exclusively" was read as qualifying "Halwais" and not the articles. On that construction, a Halwai could sell both exempt articles ordinarily prepared by Halwais and other commodities, and exemption would apply to the former notwithstanding sale of other taxable or separately exempt goods. Since the return and affidavit showed that the petitioners sold articles ordinarily prepared by Halwais as well as sugar, the whole turnover could not be treated as taxable merely because they were not dealing only in Halwai articles.

Conclusion: The assessment to sales tax on the petitioners' gross turnover was not justified, and the impugned assessment order was quashed. The petitioners were entitled to restraint against levy on sales of articles ordinarily prepared by Halwais and other articles exempt under Schedule B.

Ratio Decidendi: In an exemption entry, the word "exclusively" must be construed according to its grammatical placement and may qualify the dealer rather than the goods, so that exemption cannot be denied merely because the dealer also sells other commodities.

---